1. Rupley, W. H., & Slough, S. W. (In Press). Building prior knowledge and vocabulary in science. Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction).

2. Niemitz, M., Slough, S., Peart, L., Klaus, A., St. John, K., & Leckie, M. (in press). Interactive virtual expeditions as a learning tool: The School of Rock expedition case study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia.

3. Slough, S., McTigue, E. M., Kim, S. & Jennings, S. (in press). Science textbook’s use of graphical representation : A Descriptive analysis of four sixth-grade science text. Reading Psychology ^*

4. Slough, S. W. & McTigue, E. M. (Eds.) (In Press). Special issue on science and reading in Reading Psychology.

5. McTigue, E. M., & Slough, S. (in press). Student-accessible science texts : Elements of design. Reading Psychology.

6. Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (Eds.). (2008). Project based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

7. Morgan, J. & Slough, S. W. (2008). Classroom management considerations: Implementing STEM PBL. In R. M. Capraro and S. W. Slough (Eds.) Project-Based Learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Technology (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SENSE Publishing.

8. Chamblee, G. E., & Slough, Scott W. (2008). Measuring mathematics and science teachers' perceptions of technology and change: A yearlong study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(2), 183-194.

9. Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. (2008). Theoretical framework for Project-Based Learning (PBL). In R. M. Capraro and S. W. Slough (Eds.) Project-Based Learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Technology (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SENSE Publishing. ^*

10. Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. (2008). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro & S. W. Slough (Eds.), Project based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1-6). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

1. Rupley, W. H., & Slough, S. W. (In Press). Building prior knowledge and vocabulary in science. Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction).

2. Niemitz, M., Slough, S., Peart, L., Klaus, A., St. John, K., & Leckie, M. (in press). Interactive virtual expeditions as a learning tool: The School of Rock expedition case study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia.

3. Slough, S., McTigue, E. M., Kim, S. & Jennings, S. (in press). Science textbook’s use of graphical representation : A Descriptive analysis of four sixth-grade science text. Reading Psychology ^*

4. Slough, S. W. & McTigue, E. M. (Eds.) (In Press). Special issue on science and reading in Reading Psychology.

5. McTigue, E. M., & Slough, S. (in press). Student-accessible science texts : Elements of design. Reading Psychology.

6. Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (Eds.). (2008). Project based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

7. Morgan, J. & Slough, S. W. (2008). Classroom management considerations: Implementing STEM PBL. In R. M. Capraro and S. W. Slough (Eds.) Project-Based Learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Technology (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SENSE Publishing.

8. Chamblee, G. E., & Slough, Scott W. (2008). Measuring mathematics and science teachers' perceptions of technology and change: A yearlong study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27(2), 183-194.

9. Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. (2008). Theoretical framework for Project-Based Learning (PBL). In R. M. Capraro and S. W. Slough (Eds.) Project-Based Learning: An integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Technology (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SENSE Publishing. ^*

10. Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. (2008). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro & S. W. Slough (Eds.), Project based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1-6). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

11. Slough, S. W., & Chamblee, G. E. (2007). Technology as an innovation in science and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics Journal,107(6), 222-224.

12. Leckie, R. M., St. John, K., Peart, L., Klaus, A., Slough, S., and Nimitz, M. (2006). Education and Science Connect at Sea. EOS Transactions, AGU, Volume 87, Issue 24, p. 240-241.

13. Slough, S.W., Chamblee, G.E. (2002). Graphing Calculators and Algebra I, Algebra II, IPC, and Chemistry Teachers' Perceptions of Change. In D. Willis, J. Price, & N. Davis (Eds.). Information Technology and Teacher Eduatioin Annual, 2002. pgs 1066-1070. Charlettsville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

14. Chamblee, G.E., & Slough, S.W. (2002). Implementing Technology in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms: Is the Implementation Process the Same for Both Disciplines. In D. Willis, J. Price, and N. Davis (Eds.). Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21(1), 3-15.

15. Slough, S.W., & Chamblee, G.E. (2002). Science and Mathematics Teachers Perceptions of Graphing Calculators and Change. In D. Willis, J. Price, & N. Davis(Eds.). Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2002pgs.2139-2143. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

16. Slough, S.W., Chamblee, G.E., & Aull, J. (2001). Intergrating Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education Goals: An Interdisciplinary Approach. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis, J. Willis (Eds.). Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2001 pgs. 2541-2546. Charlettsville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

17. Slough, S.W., Chamblee, G.E. (2000). Grades 4 and 5 Teachers' Perceptions of Technology Implementation in Mathematics Instruction. In R. Roson (Ed.). Mathematics/Science Education and Technolgy Annual, 200 pgs. 363-368. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

18. Slough, S.W., Chamblee, G.E. (2000). Implementing Technology in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms: A Perspective on Change. In D.A. Willis, J.D. Wilis, and J. Willis (Eds.). Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2000 pgs. 1021-1026. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

19. Slough, S.W. (1999). A Description of Telecommunications Use in the High School Science Classroom. In D.A. Thomas (Ed). Mathematics/Science Education and Technology Annual, 1999 pg. 438. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

20. Slough, S.W. (1999). High School Science Teachers' Perceptions of Barriers and Supporting Conditions to Telecommunications Implementation. In D.A. Thomas (Ed.). Mathematics/Science Education and Technology Annual, 1999 pgs. 526-530. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advnacement of Computing in Education.

21. Chamblee, G., Silvia, J., Slough, S.W., Louden, C. (1999). Implementing Techonology in Secondary Mathematics and Science Classrooms: Do We Have Common Goals? Barriers? Models for Change?. In D.A. Thomas (Ed). Mathematics/Science Education and Technology Annual, 1999 pgs. 396-399. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

22. Slough, S.W. (1999). Some Concerns about the Concerns-based Adoption Model (CBAM) and Technology. In J.D. Price, J. Willis, D.A. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.). Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1999 pgs. 1949-1953. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

23. Slough, S.W., McGrew-Zoubi (1996). Authoring on the World Wide Web: Getting Reluctant Preservice Teachers Involved. Technology and Teacher Edcuation Annual, 1996 pgs. 719-722. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

24. Slough, S.W., McGrew-Zoubi (1996). Getting Reluctant Teachers Published on the World Wide Web: An Emplowerment Strategy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education.4(3/4) 215-229. Charlettesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

25. Slough, S.W. (1995). Authoring on the World Wide Web: Getting Reluctant Preservice Teachers Involved. Across-the-University Writing Program, Vol.13 pgs. 5-6.

26. Bryan, J. A. & Slough, S. W. (In Press). Converging lens simulation design and image predictions. Physics Education.
Show Top 10